California voters pass Proposition 1 to tackle homelessness crisis : NPR

California voters pass Proposition 1 to tackle homelessness crisis : NPR

[ad_1]

California Gov. Gavin Newsom speaks in help of Proposition 1, a $6.38 billion bond poll measure, throughout a information convention on the Los Angeles Common Medical Heart in Los Angeles, Wednesday, Jan. 3, 2024.

Damian Dovarganes/AP


conceal caption

toggle caption

Damian Dovarganes/AP


California Gov. Gavin Newsom speaks in help of Proposition 1, a $6.38 billion bond poll measure, throughout a information convention on the Los Angeles Common Medical Heart in Los Angeles, Wednesday, Jan. 3, 2024.

Damian Dovarganes/AP

SACRAMENTO, Calif. — California voters have authorised a measure that may impose strict necessities on counties to spend on housing and drug therapy applications to sort out the state’s homelessness disaster, in a tissue-thin win for Gov. Gavin Newsom, who personally campaigned for the measure’s passage.

Democrats outnumber Republicans by a staggering 2-to-1 in California, and the borderline vote — coming greater than two weeks after election day — signaled unease with the state’s homeless insurance policies after Newsom’s administration invested billions of {dollars} to get individuals off the road however no dramatic change has been seen in Los Angeles and different giant cities.

The state accounts for almost a 3rd of the homeless inhabitants in the US; roughly 181,000 Californians are in want of housing.

Newsom, who made the measure a signature proposal, spent important money and time campaigning on its behalf. He raised greater than $13 million to market it with the help of regulation enforcement, first responders, hospitals and mayors of main cities. Opponents raised simply $1,000.

Proposition 1 marks the primary replace to the state’s psychological well being system in 20 years.

“That is the most important change in many years in how California tackles homelessness, and a victory for doing issues radically completely different,” Newsom mentioned in a press release after the borderline vote. “Now, counties and native officers should match the ambition of California voters. This historic reform will solely succeed if all of us kick into motion instantly – state authorities and native leaders, collectively.”

Counties will now be required to spend about two-thirds of the cash from a voter-approved tax enacted in 2004 on millionaires for psychological well being companies on housing and applications for homeless individuals with critical psychological diseases or substance abuse issues.

The state, with a present stock of 5,500 beds, wants some 8,000 extra models to deal with psychological well being and dependancy points.

The initiative additionally permits the state to borrow $6.38 billion to construct 4,350 housing models, half of which shall be reserved for veterans, and add 6,800 psychological well being and dependancy therapy beds.

Opponents, together with social service suppliers and county officers, mentioned the change will threaten applications that aren’t solely centered on housing or drug therapy however maintain individuals from changing into homeless within the first place.

Critics mentioned the only method may imply rural counties reminiscent of Butte, with a homeless inhabitants of fewer than 1,300 individuals, can be required to divert the identical share of funds to housing as city counties reminiscent of San Francisco, which has a homeless inhabitants six occasions larger.

With makeshift tents lining streets and disrupting companies in communities throughout the state, homelessness has change into probably the most irritating points in California and one certain to canine Newsom ought to he ever mount a nationwide marketing campaign.

Newsom touted the proposition as the ultimate piece in his plan to reform California’s psychological well being system. He has already pushed for legal guidelines that make it simpler to power individuals with behavioral well being points into therapy.

William Elias, a tv producer in Sacramento, mentioned he “was on the fence” about Proposition 1 however determined to vote in favor of it due to the pervasive homelessness drawback.

“That is one thing that is throughout us proper now,” he mentioned. “We received all these tents out right here in entrance of Metropolis Corridor.”

Estrellita Vivirito, a Palm Springs resident, additionally voted ‘sure’ on the measure.

“It is solely logical, you realize, we have now to do one thing,” she mentioned.

Katherine Wolf, a doctoral pupil on the College of California, Berkeley, mentioned she voted ‘no’ on the measure out of issues it could end in extra individuals being locked up towards their will.

“I used to be appalled of the system of legal guidelines that he has been constructing to sort of erode the rights of individuals with psychological disabilities,” Wolf mentioned of Newsom.

Griffin Bovee, a Republican state employee in Sacramento, additionally voted towards the proposition and mentioned the state has been losing taxpayer cash.

“Sacramento actually should not get one other dime till they really determine why what they’re doing shouldn’t be working,” he mentioned of the state’s dealing with of the homelessness disaster. “They spent $20 billion over the previous few years making an attempt to repair that drawback and it received worse.”

Income from the tax on millionaires, now between $2 billion and $3 billion a yr, supplies about one-third of the state’s whole psychological well being funds.

Opponents, together with some county officers, psychological well being service suppliers and a few Republicans, mentioned the poll measure would reduce funding from cultural facilities, peer-support applications and vocational companies and would pit these applications towards companies for homeless individuals.

Newsom’s administration has already spent not less than $22 billion on numerous applications to handle the disaster, together with $3.5 billion to transform rundown motels into homeless housing. California can also be giving out $2 billion in grants to construct extra therapy services.

author

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *