By [ad_1]
When the robotic lander Odysseus last month became the first American-built spacecraft to touch down on the moon in additional than 50 years, it toppled over at an angle. That restricted the quantity of science it may do on the lunar floor, as a result of its antennas and photo voltaic panels weren’t pointed within the right instructions.
Only a month earlier, one other spacecraft, the Good Lander for Investigating Moon, or SLIM, despatched by the Japanese house company, had additionally tipped throughout touchdown, ending up on its head.
Why is there a sudden epidemic of spacecraft rolling on the moon like Olympic gymnasts performing flooring routines? Is it actually that troublesome to land upright there?
On the web and elsewhere, folks pointed to the peak of the Odysseus lander — 14 ft from the underside of the touchdown ft to the photo voltaic arrays on the prime — as a contributing issue for its off-kilter landing.
Had Intuitive Machines, the maker of Odysseus, made an apparent error in constructing the spacecraft that means?
The corporate’s officers present an engineering rationale for the tall, skinny design, however these web commenters do have some extent.
One thing tall falls over extra simply than an object that’s quick and squat. And on the moon, the place the pull of gravity is simply one-sixth as sturdy as on Earth, the propensity to tip over is even higher.
This isn’t a brand new realization. A half-century in the past, Apollo astronauts had firsthand expertise as they hopped round on the moon, and generally tumbled to the bottom.
On the social media web site X final week, Philip Metzger, a former NASA engineer who’s now a planetary scientist on the College of Central Florida, defined the math and the physics of why it’s tougher to stay standing on the moon.
“I’ve truly gone by means of calculations, and it’s actually scary,” Dr. Metzger mentioned. “The facet movement that may tip a lander of that measurement is just a few meters per second in lunar gravity.” (One meter per second is, in on a regular basis American models, a bit greater than two miles per hour.)
There are two elements to this query of stability.
The primary is static stability. If one thing is standing at a lot of an angle, it’ll fall over if the middle of gravity is to the surface of the touchdown legs.
Right here, it seems the utmost angle of leaning is identical on Earth as it’s on the moon. It could be the identical on any world, giant or small, as a result of gravity cancels out of the equation.
Nevertheless, the reply modifications if the spacecraft remains to be transferring. Odysseus was speculated to land vertically with zero horizontal velocity, however due to issues with the navigation system, it was nonetheless transferring sideways when it hit the bottom.
“Instinct that’s primarily based on Earth is now a legal responsibility,” Dr. Metzger mentioned.
He gave the instance of attempting to push over the fridge in your kitchen. “It’s so heavy {that a} slight push shouldn’t be going to push it over,” Dr. Metzger mentioned.
However you substitute it with a bit of Styrofoam within the form of a fridge, mimicking the load of an actual fridge in lunar gravity, “then a really mild push will push it over,” Dr. Metzger mentioned.
Assuming the spacecraft stays in a single piece, it might rotate on the level of contact the place the touchdown foot touches the bottom.
Dr. Metzger’s calculations recommended that for a spacecraft like Odysseus, the touchdown legs should be splayed about two and a half occasions as vast on the moon as on the Earth to counteract the identical quantity of sideways movement.
If, for instance, six ft vast had been sufficient for touchdown on Earth on the most horizontal velocity, then the legs must be 15 ft aside so as to not tip on the moon on the identical sideways velocity.
For simplicity of design, the touchdown legs of Odysseus didn’t fold up, and the diameter of the SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket that lifted it to house restricted how vast the touchdown legs may unfold out.
“So, on the moon, you must design to maintain the sideways velocities very low at landing, a lot decrease than you’ll if touchdown the automobile in Earth’s gravity,” Dr. Metzger wrote on X.
I too questioned in regards to the form of the lander once I visited the Intuitive Machines headquarters and manufacturing unit in Houston in February final yr.
“Why so tall?” I requested.
Steve Altemus, the chief govt of Intuitive Machines, replied that it needed to do with the tanks that maintain the spacecraft’s liquid methane and liquid oxygen propellants.
The methane weighs twice as a lot because the oxygen, so if the methane tank had been positioned subsequent to the oxygen tank, the lander would have been unbalanced. As a substitute, the 2 tanks had been stacked on prime of one another.
“That created the peak,” Mr. Altemus mentioned.
Scott Manley, who offers commentary about rockets on X and YouTube, famous that Mr. Altemus had led the event of a shorter, squatter lander when he was at NASA a decade in the past.
That check lander, named Morpheus, additionally used methane and oxygen propellants, however the tanks had been configured in pairs to maintain the load in steadiness. It was by no means meant to fly to house.
In an interview, Mr. Manley mentioned that design would have labored for the Intuitive Machines lander as properly however would have made the spacecraft heavier and extra complicated.
If the spacecraft wanted two methane tanks and two oxygen tanks, the spacecraft construction would have wanted to be greater and heavier. The tanks would have been heavier too.
“You’ve acquired extra floor space, in order that’s extra floor to insulate,” Mr. Manley mentioned. He added that it might even have wanted “extra plumbing and extra valves, extra issues to go fallacious.”
For the touchdown web site within the south pole area, the peak of Odysseus provided one other benefit. On the backside of the moon, daylight shines at low angles, producing lengthy shadows. If Odysseus had remained upright, the photo voltaic arrays on the prime of the spacecraft would have remained out of shadows longer, producing extra energy for the mission.
In the course of the go to to Intuitive Machines, Tim Crain, the corporate’s chief expertise officer, mentioned the spacecraft had been designed to remain upright when touchdown even on a slope of 10 levels or extra. The navigation software program was programmed to search for a spot the place the slope was 5 levels or much less.
As a result of the laser devices on Odysseus for measuring altitude weren’t working throughout descent, the spacecraft landed sooner than deliberate on a 12-degree slope. That exceeded its design limits. Odysseus skidded alongside the floor, broke one in all its six legs and tipped to its facet.
If the laser devices had been working, “We might have nailed the touchdown,” Mr. Altemus mentioned throughout a information convention final week
The identical considerations will apply for SpaceX’s humongous Starship, which is able to take two NASA astronauts to the moon’s floor as quickly as 2026.
Starship, as tall as a 16-story constructing, should come down completely vertically and keep away from vital slopes. However these must be solvable engineering challenges, Dr. Metzger mentioned.
“It removes among the margin of error in your dynamic stability, but it surely doesn’t take away all of the margin of error,” Dr. Metzger mentioned of a tall lander. “The quantity of margin that you’ve got left is manageable so long as your different methods on the spacecraft are functioning.”
